<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sequin Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/</link>
	<description>Artist &#38; Purveyor Of Mad Obsessive Projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ARTSHARKS</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6011</link>
		<dc:creator>ARTSHARKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-6011</guid>
		<description>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.

Kudos on your work!

twitter: @artsharksnet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.</p>
<p>Kudos on your work!</p>
<p>twitter: @artsharksnet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARTSHARKS</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7469</link>
		<dc:creator>ARTSHARKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7469</guid>
		<description>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.

Kudos on your work!

twitter: @artsharksnet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.</p>
<p>Kudos on your work!</p>
<p>twitter: @artsharksnet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARTSHARKS</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7470</link>
		<dc:creator>ARTSHARKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7470</guid>
		<description>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.

Kudos on your work!

twitter: @artsharksnet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the apron looks lovely, I suggest taking more photos in the direction of the second shot you posted. I believe if you play with the lighting with that setting you can come out with some really nice shots.</p>
<p>Kudos on your work!</p>
<p>twitter: @artsharksnet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7467</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7467</guid>
		<description>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7468</guid>
		<description>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe restricting it one hour is the answer to intensive, repetitive processes?  Or is that too obvious a comment?  I like very much how you are dealing with this piece on this sequin update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lean Ni Chuilleanain</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6006</link>
		<dc:creator>Lean Ni Chuilleanain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-6006</guid>
		<description>That is BRILLIANT.

I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#039;re taking two stitches through each one).

Plus, &lt;i&gt;chickens&lt;/i&gt;!

(Hi, by the way. I&#039;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#039;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is BRILLIANT.</p>
<p>I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#8217;re taking two stitches through each one).</p>
<p>Plus, <i>chickens</i>!</p>
<p>(Hi, by the way. I&#8217;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#8217;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lean Ni Chuilleanain</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator>Lean Ni Chuilleanain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7465</guid>
		<description>That is BRILLIANT.

I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#039;re taking two stitches through each one).

Plus, &lt;i&gt;chickens&lt;/i&gt;!

(Hi, by the way. I&#039;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#039;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is BRILLIANT.</p>
<p>I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#8217;re taking two stitches through each one).</p>
<p>Plus, <i>chickens</i>!</p>
<p>(Hi, by the way. I&#8217;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#8217;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lean Ni Chuilleanain</title>
		<link>http://kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/comment-page-1/#comment-7466</link>
		<dc:creator>Lean Ni Chuilleanain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirstyhall.co.uk/?p=1186#comment-7466</guid>
		<description>That is BRILLIANT.

I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#039;re taking two stitches through each one).

Plus, &lt;i&gt;chickens&lt;/i&gt;!

(Hi, by the way. I&#039;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#039;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is BRILLIANT.</p>
<p>I love the whole apron / glamour thing, and the way that sequins are such a peculiarly labour-intensive embellishment (even more so than beads, I suppose, at least if you&#8217;re taking two stitches through each one).</p>
<p>Plus, <i>chickens</i>!</p>
<p>(Hi, by the way. I&#8217;ve been enjoying your blog for a while, but I&#8217;m pretty sure this is my first comment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  kirstyhall.co.uk/2009/10/30/sequin-update/feed/ ) in 0.28321 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 2:15 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 3:15 pm UTC -->
